+ Register

[esoito]

Thank you Max for sharing something so interesting (I rarely thank anyone for sharing as I rarely see appreciation from others for my efforts).

My pleasure. And thank you for your kind comment.


Just a couple of questions, I assume you had good results but for how long, are the results sufficient in order to prove something?

Good question. 

To answer it, here's part of what I emailed to my colleague only yesterday:


"Another excellent and potentially profitable result for the file just received from you -- thanks for that.

We shall see for certain once it goes through the program I've yet to write.

But I'm satisfied there is sufficient prima facie evidence of attraction between 3 6 9 in time, and 3 6 9 in the  flow of numbers being spun, regardless of RNG or live as the source,  to warrant further exploration via the proposed software."


So as you see,  a work in progress, but with what we believe to be great potential.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating -- hence the need for the software to do the heavy-lifting-number-crunching.

Does it have to do with numerology?

According to this Wikipedia definition:

"Numerology is any belief in the divine or mystical relationship between a number and one or more coinciding events. It is also the study of the numerical value of the letters in words, names and ideas. It is often associated with the paranormal, alongside astrology and similar divinatory arts."


We seem to have found a "... relationship between a number and one or more coinciding events."

I have to confess it's rather taken us by surprise!

However, whether or not it's divine or mystical is unclear...Maybe...Maybe not.

[alrelax]

Your last sentence is spot-on.  I would say in my own words, sometimes sometimes not or at times it applies and at times it does not.  It all depends on the presentments.

[Blue_Angel]

I believe there are much more than meet the eye and we should try to keep an open mind.
Reality is only limited by what we know (or think we know).

[greenguy]

Not knowing what it is that you are applying to the 3.6.9, once it does go through the program you've yet to write, would it be possible to also test other number groups for comparison? Initially 2.5.8, and 1.4.7, and for a complete study, every 3 number combination from 1 through 9?

It would be very interesting to see if the grouping 3.6.9 outperformed all other groupings.

[Blue_Angel]

Not knowing what it is that you are applying to the 3.6.9, once it does go through the program you've yet to write, would it be possible to also test other number groups for comparison? Initially 2.5.8, and 1.4.7, and for a complete study, every 3 number combination from 1 through 9?

It would be very interesting to see if the grouping 3.6.9 outperformed all other groupings.

I'm interested about it too, Max I'd appreciated your feedback, thanks.

[esoito]

Just to clarify:

I'm not talking about betting on the numbers 3,  6 and 9 per se.

Our research is aimed at several number combinations we have identified that involve underlying patterns of 3 or 6 or 9, or even all three.

These are:

* various number combinations which are based on number 3

* various number combinations which are based on number 6

* various number combinations which are based on number 9

and

* how they relate to specific times of appearance, which are also based on 3, 6,  9


Why 3 and 6 and 9?  Because they are the specific numbers identified by Tesla.

More than enough work there to keep me from playing on the road for quite a while! Especially as my time and energy is limited by other commitments.


But your query could perhaps open up ideas for others to follow.

[Blue_Angel]

Just to clarify:

I'm not talking about betting on the numbers 3,  6 and 9 per se.

Our research is aimed at several number combinations we have identified that involve underlying patterns of 3 or 6 or 9, or even all three.

These are:

* various number combinations which are based on number 3

* various number combinations which are based on number 6

* various number combinations which are based on number 9

and

* how they relate to specific times of appearance, which are also based on 3, 6,  9


Why 3 and 6 and 9?  Because they are the specific numbers identified by Tesla.

More than enough work there to keep me from playing on the road for quite a while! Especially as my time and energy is limited by other commitments.


But your query could perhaps open up ideas for others to follow.

I presume that you are not talking about the finals, for example when you say numbers related to 3 you mean 3, 12, 21 and 30 OR 3, 13, 23 and 33, which of these groups??
The first is related numerologicaly while the second group is related according to finals.
My opinion is that since you are following Nicola Tesla clues you are not betting finals.
There could be a number of ways to combine them, for example if we would count them as group and not individually then there would be too many combinations to take under consideration, for example the numbers 4, 11, 23, 25 could be considered as 9 group even are not related directly with any of the 3,6,9 properties.
That's because 4+11+23+25=63 and 6+3=9
If you are combining in such way then all numbers could be related with 3,6,9 properties, but I think you are not doing this because you wouldn't know what to bet since all would fit.


From the other hand, if you consider each number strictly related to properties of 3,6 and 9 groups then you would discard 25 numbers including 0, that's because group 3 is related directly with 3,12,21 and 30, group 6 is directly related with 6,15,24 and 33, group 9 is directly related with numbers 9,18,27 and 36.


Both approaches seem flawed on first sight but for different reasons.
By timing your selection you probably mean to bet only every 3 spins since 3,6,9 are all multiples of 3, yet that doesn't equate necessarily that you will bet every third spin because your criteria don't allow frequent betting.


Please confirm and/or decline where appropriate, thank you.

[esoito]

That's a familiar process you're exploring above -- set up a hypothesis and then test it.

Refine and test...refine and test...

It's a matter of looking under rocks, exploring various tunnels. Some lead to other tunnels; some are dead-ends.

Already, with your observations above you've started a journey on Tesla's 369 train.  Why not continue your journey?

I can certainly confirm the journey is time-consuming and often frustrating. Sometimes disappointing. It even goes off the rails at times.

As to the destination, mine is to complete the journey for the lowest possible cost and for the best profit possible.

At this early stage of exploration it would be unwise to rule anything out, despite how things might seem at first sight.

Your excellent observation is worth repeating:  "Reality is only limited by what we know (or think we know)."

In taking up you invitation to confirm or decline I must decline to comment further lest I send folk in the wrong direction, or lest I restrict their freedom to discover for themselves by explaining my own parameters and restrictions thus far.

They need to work out their own travel plans on the 369 train. 

[Blue_Angel]

I'm puzzled by your attitude, first you provide sufficient clues to attract some interest and then you bluntly refuse to incorporate any further! 
However, I respect your indisputable right to decline any additional exposure, but why did you initiate it on the first place?
If I was something like a troll I'd claim that you are playing the secret squirrel game...but I don't!
One thing is for sure, what you are up to might be interesting but cannot be considered as proven (not even to you and your colleague), thus why the secrecy for something which might be proved baloney(as 99.9% of all cases in long term basis)?
More minds accomplish more and faster than fewer, just think about it.
Besides, doesn't it what such forum's purpose suppose to serve?
To share, collaborate and progress together?

[esoito]

My original 369 post was in the Brainstorming Thread.

To correct you, I didn't initiate the discussion about 369 in this thread.

Instead, I offered the courtesy of a reply to a couple of questions asked about that topic I posted in the Brainstroming thread..

If you don't like the answers, or feel they were inadequate, you'll have to cope as best you can. What you like, or what you feel, is not my responsibility.

I have no interest in being drawn into an argument.

At this point, I have no further comments to make on this topic. Maybe later.

Sufficient unto the day...