Baccarat is a dynamic probability game where each hand is somewhat related to the past and when it seems it doesn't is because too many (unlikely) coincidental results happen and we've seen that just one hand could transform a more likely line into an unexpected one.
Obviously and since we can't rely upon a verified math advantage, our action must be approximated by considering more likely situations (ranges) and the asym/sym tool is one of the best to assess more probable ranges happening along the course of a shoe.
Suppose we have devised the asym/sym nature of some patterns of interest and a shoe went as (W= first winning attempt and L= anything else):
L-L-W-L-L-W-W-W-L-W-L-W-L
Even if W<L, we find bettable spots where things are suppsoed to change. Notice that W isolated events are 3:1 than W clusters, yet isolated L events are equal to L clustered events. Finally no L streak went past than two.
Another shoe:
W-W-L-L-L-L-W-W-W-W-L-W-W-W-W-W-L-L-L
Now W>L (11:
yet the above propensity to get short L clusters went down the drain.
So what seemed to fail at the previous shoe (W clusters, short L sequences) now becomes a kind of opposite world.
A third shoe:
W-L-W-L-W-W-W-W-W-L-W-W-L-L-L-L
W/L is 9:7, W clusters come out by the same amount than W isolated events, isolated L events/clustered L events ratio is 3:1.
More shoes:
W-L-W-L-W-W-L-W-W-W-W-L-W-L
L-L-W-W-L-L-W-L-L-L
W-L-L-W-W-L-W-W-W-L-W-W
W-W-W-W-W-L-W-L-L-W-L-L-L-L-L-L
L-W-W-W-L-W-W-W-W-L-L-W-W-L-W-W
W-L-L-W-W-L-L-L-W-W-W-L-L-W-L-L-L
W-L-W-L-L-W-W-W-W-L-L-W-L-L-L-L-L
L-W-L-W-L-L-L-L-L-L-L
W-L-L-W-W-L-W-L-L-L-W-L-W-L-L-W
L-L-L-W-L-W-W-L-L-L
W-L-W-L-W-W-W-W-W-L-W-W-L-W-L
W-L-L-W-W-W-W-W-L-L-L-L-L-L-W
L-L-W-W-W-W-W-L-L-W-W-W-L
W-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-W-W-L-W-L
W-W-W-W-L-W-W-W-W-W-W-L-L-W-W-L-L
L-L-W-L-W-L-L-W-L-W-L-W-W-W-W-L-L-W-W-L-L
W-W-L-L-W-W-L-W-L-W-W-L-L-W
W-W-L-L-W-W-W-L-L-L-W-L-L-L-L (11.037)
Now pretend to get fictional various players registering conseutive losses at different W/L patterns, for example:
a- First player will bet toward W clusters, getting W isolated events as enemy;
b- Second player will bet toward L clusters, getting L isolated events as enemy.
Greater will be the negative deviations before betting (especially when coming out at both players' action) higher will be our edge as a moderate/strong deviation is kind of insensitive of the possible negative permutations.
Remember the the best way to get an edge without risking our bankroll is by flat betting.
That's just the first winning attempt, next week we'll see about the second winning (or recovering) step.
as.
Obviously and since we can't rely upon a verified math advantage, our action must be approximated by considering more likely situations (ranges) and the asym/sym tool is one of the best to assess more probable ranges happening along the course of a shoe.
Suppose we have devised the asym/sym nature of some patterns of interest and a shoe went as (W= first winning attempt and L= anything else):
L-L-W-L-L-W-W-W-L-W-L-W-L
Even if W<L, we find bettable spots where things are suppsoed to change. Notice that W isolated events are 3:1 than W clusters, yet isolated L events are equal to L clustered events. Finally no L streak went past than two.
Another shoe:
W-W-L-L-L-L-W-W-W-W-L-W-W-W-W-W-L-L-L
Now W>L (11:

So what seemed to fail at the previous shoe (W clusters, short L sequences) now becomes a kind of opposite world.
A third shoe:
W-L-W-L-W-W-W-W-W-L-W-W-L-L-L-L
W/L is 9:7, W clusters come out by the same amount than W isolated events, isolated L events/clustered L events ratio is 3:1.
More shoes:
W-L-W-L-W-W-L-W-W-W-W-L-W-L
L-L-W-W-L-L-W-L-L-L
W-L-L-W-W-L-W-W-W-L-W-W
W-W-W-W-W-L-W-L-L-W-L-L-L-L-L-L
L-W-W-W-L-W-W-W-W-L-L-W-W-L-W-W
W-L-L-W-W-L-L-L-W-W-W-L-L-W-L-L-L
W-L-W-L-L-W-W-W-W-L-L-W-L-L-L-L-L
L-W-L-W-L-L-L-L-L-L-L
W-L-L-W-W-L-W-L-L-L-W-L-W-L-L-W
L-L-L-W-L-W-W-L-L-L
W-L-W-L-W-W-W-W-W-L-W-W-L-W-L
W-L-L-W-W-W-W-W-L-L-L-L-L-L-W
L-L-W-W-W-W-W-L-L-W-W-W-L
W-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-W-W-L-W-L
W-W-W-W-L-W-W-W-W-W-W-L-L-W-W-L-L
L-L-W-L-W-L-L-W-L-W-L-W-W-W-W-L-L-W-W-L-L
W-W-L-L-W-W-L-W-L-W-W-L-L-W
W-W-L-L-W-W-W-L-L-L-W-L-L-L-L (11.037)
Now pretend to get fictional various players registering conseutive losses at different W/L patterns, for example:
a- First player will bet toward W clusters, getting W isolated events as enemy;
b- Second player will bet toward L clusters, getting L isolated events as enemy.
Greater will be the negative deviations before betting (especially when coming out at both players' action) higher will be our edge as a moderate/strong deviation is kind of insensitive of the possible negative permutations.
Remember the the best way to get an edge without risking our bankroll is by flat betting.
That's just the first winning attempt, next week we'll see about the second winning (or recovering) step.
as.