Sputnik = satellite of EC bets 


You will never become rich like Richard if your repertoire contains only outside bets, unless you have open your third eye...! 

Quote from: HansHuckebein on March 12, 2018, 06:12:36 PM
hi bleu angel,

thank you very much for replying. 

You explained your approach perfectly clear. I've  been experimenting with simiilar ideas  for some time. but it never got me anywhere. well, I surely will take the variables you suggested into consideration and see what happens.

cheers
Hans

Hello Hans, what I've described on my previous post it has been tested flat bet.
It has ups and downs but the ups are more than the downs, thus it accumulates net profit over the time.
If you try it the way I described you might find yourself a lot of opportunities to end your session with a profit. 

The "avant dernier" or "before last" or "penultimate" selection is trying to catch chops and streaks and its nemesis are pairs of EC's, EC's occurring in couples.


Therefore, like any other bet selection, has its weakness and is no better, BUT what if we would separate it in 2 different bets?


1 bet covers the streaks and the 2nd covers the chops simultaneously.
What and when is the most important and I'm going to tell you;


You might wonder why to let you know, just because it's good it doesn't mean that there is no better, so that's why I'm willing to share freely something simply decent, good, because I've the exceptional and I have no need and/or obligation to sell or give away a thing.

Let's say that you see a change in the dozens, let's say that this change was from 1st to 2nd, this change is the trigger, as a matter of fact every change in dozens/columns is a trigger.
So in this case you should bet the last dozen/column PLUS the opposite EC, for this example, after 1st and 2nd dozen the opposite EC would be HIGH, therefore 1 unit on 2nd dozen + 1 unit on HIGH.


Another example with columns, 1st spin 1st column and 2nd spin comes 2nd column, in such case you would bet 1 unit on 2nd column + 1 unit on the opposite EC which is RED.


I hope it's clear.

Quote from: Mr J on March 05, 2018, 11:07:15 PM
So you walk into the casino and ask pit to code it? What do they usually tell you?

Ken

It doesn't work that way!


@ JL,


Every now and then, in the course of decades, someones like you comes along and reinvents the Martingale...
Almost forgot, Hit And Run it's what really boosts your system!
You may ignore the inconvenient truth but what do I care, you know better!

A fact about EC bets is that every time something leads and the opposite follows, EVERY TIME by small or greater margin, but EVERY time!
What is on the tail, which means it follows, might or might not catch up during your session.
If you new which side is going to dominate you would win flat betting and the size of your profit would be equal to the difference between the 2 opposing sides.
BUT since you don't know which the FTL selection is your best bet because how any EC could lead if not forming long streaks or shorter but more frequent?!
Every chop doesn't make any difference in the sense that it doesn't decrease or increase the lead of any EC, theoriticaly are equal BUT it doesn't mean that it has to bring 1 result for 1 side and 1 for the other!
Sooner or later 1 of the 2 sides takes the lead, the only way to expose such persistent and universal fact is by exposing the streaks/series and the way to get advantage of them is by betting the last EC.
It's harder to find balance the more the results you see/bet, for example is much easier to find 1 black and 1 red in 2 results rather than 10 blacks and 10 reds in 20 spins, there might be decrease of the deviation BUT THIS DOESN'T MEAN BALANCE/EQUAL!
For example I flat bet FTL for 100 spins, do you think that there will be 49 blacks and 49 reds and 2 zeros as probability theory suggests?
Far out! It's much more possible to witness a difference of 10 to 20 for one of the sides which means 10 to 20 units net if not any zeros.
Let's take one step further and say that you bet 100 more spins and this time the opposite side takes turn for its streaks/series, that is profit too!
It could reduce the deviation but since you are betting streaks of either side you don't care!
I would play that way if I hadn't any better betting method.

14 years don't mean a thing to me, perhaps I'm betting more spins in a year than you in 14 years!
Time doesn't matter by itself but only what you do and how often you do it on this time.
Time is the common currency of everything in life but exists only as a notion, it's just a perception, a human invention if you will in order to create a sense of order in what happened and what are we intending to do.
But certainly it doesn't exist as energy, like electricity or gravity for example.

Quote from: Sputnik on March 04, 2018, 10:12:51 AM
But the code was a waste of time - we who has experience and been around for 10 year or more know that all existing systems fail after several simulations.
When are we going to see a test that show us what a system is made of - what kind of variance and imbalance it create during the short term.
We know everything even out towards expectation in the long run.

For example - why did you not show us the true odds?
Assume you would count for how many times you win before the eight pattern show for each and every cycle and measuring does values to give us the median value for the 50% probability benchmark in the short term.

The coding modell below is what i use then exploring sleepers (no matter amount of numbers) and i never get the true odds and where the 50% benchmark is something else then the true odds.

Cycle's - Strikes - Skips

We can use different spread of numbers/sectors.
They will come in cycles.
Sometimes they will sleep and not hit with expectation.

This method can you use with 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 numbers

I see this as you measuring the random fluctations hit ratio or bias.
Where the numbers hit ratio give us a medium value that we can take advantage of.

We can chose to play when our numbers hit or we can attack when they have fall to sleep.

Skip Streak System by Apache:

First I want tell I build this system using Ion Saliu concepts :
Skip, Streak, and Median Value.

Example :

Roulette Number: 6
Hits > 24 times
Skips > 51 43 104 1 2 29 37 77 79 15 130 15 12 7 11 131 11 129 8 16 20 14 21 12

* Sorted Skips: 1 2 7 8 11 11 12 12 14 15 15 16 20 21 29 37 43 51 77 79 104 129 130 131

* Median Skip: 16

So number 6 hit 24 times. The first row - called Skips - show ( to the right to left) the skips of number 6. Number 6 show. After 12 spins, show again, after 21 spins show again, after 14 spins number 6 show again etc. The last three skips of number 6 are 104, 43, 51.

The second row - called - Sorted Skips show all the skips for a particular number in ascending order.

The three row called - Median Skip - show the median value of the sorted skips. The median is the middle value of a string of numbers. In this example the median value of skips is 16. It should not be confused with the average. So the Median Value is the middle value in a string of values.

Therefore 50% of the values are within the median or less, and 50% are within the median or more. In my example of number 6, the skip median is 16. That mean that 50% of the time number 6 hits within a skip of 16 or less.

Now if in the string of skips of number 6 I mark :

with sign (+) I mark if the skip is greater than median value of skips
with sign (-) I mark if the skip is small than median value of skips
with sign (=) I mark if the skip is equal with median value of skips

I obtain this :

Code:

51  43  104  1  2  29  37  77  79  15  130  15  12  7  11  131  11  129  8  16  20  14  21  12

+   +    +  -  -   +   +   +   +   -    +   -   -  -   -    +   -    -  -   =   -   -   -   

1. THE STRATEGY :

We bet on the numbers which have a 3 consecutive streak of skips greater than the median value of skips. ( That mean three consecutive + )

In our example number 6 is qualified because the last three skips ( consecutive ) are 104, 43, 51. We have + + + ( three consecutive value of skips, greater than median value of skips. 16

(104 > 16) (43 > 16) (51 > 16)

1.Bet on numbers with encounter 3 consecutive signs +
2.Bet on numbers with encounter 4 consecutive signs + (tight bettors)
3.Bet on numbers until hit.
4.Bet on numbers for 37 spins
5.Bet on numbers for a number of spins equal with the median value of skips. ( In this example we bet number 6 for 16 spins)

Money managament : Flat bet.

Not bad idea but takes a lot of time in order to qualify your bet selections.
Yesterday I saw number 30 hit only once in about 150 spins and then returned after approximately 280 spins, therefore 150 + 280 = 430 spins / 2 hits = 215 average but you still would need a third skip before you start betting it!
Your method is not so practical, just my 1 cent.

Quote from: Mr J on March 01, 2018, 09:04:33 PM
Yes they should be treated differently. Don't play them. Straight ups is where its at son.

Ken

Once again benevolent Ken shares his wisdom graciously, I'd like to add:


"Great empires (aka casinos) fall from the inside (aka numbers)"
Thus don't be the outside(r) looking in(side)...because sometimes you lose and less times you win!

Just for clarification purposes, after 7 different permutations you are betting against the 8th possible permutation/pattern?


If that's the betting principle then Albalaha would argue about the validity of the reasoning.


I don't consider myself as an expert on EC's betting, that's why I've mentioned user Albalaha who, according his mentality, considers every bet selection to be the same and only a money management could make the difference.


I'm somewhat neutral regarding EC betting but I would like to be further explained the reasoning about WHY it IS better or NOT.


Thank you

 

Quote from: Mike on October 29, 2017, 05:45:37 PM
...it's not clear whether they need to be a "Sponsor" of the forum or not? There seems to be some inconsistency here. 'Mathemagician' who markets the Roulette Key Gold software and who posts regularly on the forum with updates doesn't appear to be a sponsor, nor is 'VRSEDGE', but 'Autobetic' is.

So can just anyone who has something to sell do so on this forum? What are the restrictions, if any? Recalling the recent Stephen Tabone fiasco, is there a distinction between systems and software with respect to sales?

Very good questions Mike, systems/methods don't come with stamp of authorization as proof of quality.
So what's the standard around here?
Some have been expelled as scams while others became sponsors, whether you are allowing sales or not, it's this simple.

Quote from: Gizmotron on January 08, 2013, 12:17:26 AM
Very good.

I wonder how long it will take for us to figure out that it only took about 2,000 people to give us all this. Imagine a civil war where only 2,000 targets exist.

...it took 2000 years to make such progress in debt, after 2000 years more the same debt level will has astronomical values! 

Quote from: The Crow on October 25, 2017, 12:52:39 PM
Win 1,924.00 per week and you can start giving advice again.

The Crow

What if it's 1,999.99 ?


Last time around you were complaining about casinos...now I assume you realize they don't cheat, congratulations!

Quote from: alrelax on October 25, 2017, 06:15:08 AM
[attachimg=1]

That seems like your bottom...line! 

Quote from: Gizmotron on October 25, 2017, 05:23:06 AM
I don't remember Blue. But you do get two from column A and two from column B. Wink Wink.

So fortune comes in pairs huh?!


Almost all of the time at least 1 number hits at least 3 times within 37 spins, the real question is how we could turn the remaining 0.05% of 37 spins cycles into winning ones!


The answer is shockingly simple, by betting splits instead of numbers, thus not only we could win when a number hits 3 times but also when a number hits 2 times, a win win situation!


So when a split hits twice bet it, keep on adding till 1 of them hits for 3rd time, this happens within 18 spins 99% of the time, but remember, every cycle has 37 spins to achieve a net profit, which means that could go beyond 18 spins.


I'm including 0 with 1 or 2 or 3 in the available splits and all the rest are the horizontal as you see them on the table layout.
I chose horizontal because all of them can be exclusively on such direction, but vertically cannot be all of them.
Just to avoid confusion.