The final resolution for our site is to continue "as is".


Our life continues. What we bring to the scene continues. We can make life in our website with certainty of continuation again.


Also, as things are appeased we can integrate with the other communities better. Software-wise and participation wise.


We keep our openness policy. Everybody is invited to participate, no sites are censored and basically our forum's staff keeps on conducting business as usual, with me on the IT side and keeping the seat as forum owner and administrator.


So dear friends, thank you very much for your support.


We have the opportunity to be the best site we can be for this community to thrive.


Getting our act together again,

Your old-timer friendly admin,
Vic

Actually if the language design were up to me, I could compress it further:

QuoteDo 10
    print "Hello World"

http://betselection.cc/gizmotron/

Quote from: Gizmotron on April 05, 2013, 03:30:14 PM
How much is six months of development time worth?

It varies by country and what the programmer agrees to. Over here it is usually a "per project" fee. In other countries it is measured in $/hours.

You should check the status yourself by asking an IT professional from your locality.

Quote from: Gizmotron on April 05, 2013, 01:35:10 PM
Any ideas or comments regarding this are welcome.

My comment is: if you have a clear intention of making it public from the beginning, you can release it open-source from day 1. Even from the building stages.

If you want people to use it, but don't want to disclose the "how to's" you can always make a web application, host it in a secure server and let willing people connect.


If there's money to be made, it's almost certain someone "out there" will show interest

We are getting back to normal. It is 5 am and I must go to bed, but rest assured I'm resuming work on the forum.

Wowie guys, it is quite a wonderful thing to see the friends coming together towards our common goal.


We're happily clear with extra contributions left as "insurance" for next month.


Many many thanks again 

You Rock!
Vic

Quote from: Bayes on April 01, 2013, 02:23:46 PM
Are you sure this isn't a joke?

This *is* a Joke topic bayes 

Esoito is pulling our legs about this:

Refers to: http://betselection.cc/general-discussion/a-$4-41-usd-request-for-our-hosting/

But that other topic isn't an April fool's joke: we were actually short and we actually became open to the general public for real and the few subscriptions left were cutoff.
It's a mixture of true things that happened on the funkier day of the year 

Thanks for your willingness to assist dear Sumit     It is very valued indeed yet the invoice is generated via paypal.

Hopefully we will have this sorted to be able to continue.

We don't have subscribers as of today. I did the right thing and cancelled the few subscriptions left now we're open.

After the last round of membership cancellations, we're out of paypal to pay the forum's host for exactly $4.41 and the 1st of the month is the payment day.

If someone is able to give $5 towards our hosting, it'll be taken as our last membership payment and stand for a whole month of the betting tool, valued at $30 next month.

The $5 paypal link is this:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=64GZQVANB3NLW

March being the last month we featured regular subscriptions, we're opening our doors with re-install.

Quote from: Trebor on March 30, 2013, 12:45:05 PM
Many happy returns to Mrs. TCS

From me too 

Don't "LoL" so fast!!

You compound ONE of your many session banks (first bankroll), which explodes its unit VALUE, while adding base value banks in between you and the casino at a higher rate. If your strategy is truly solid, building multiple banks with your compounding strategy is more important to stay in game than depending on a single bankroll not to have bad luck.

I *do* hope you manage to have a great time amidst those huge progressions and huge draw-downs .. Now, the strategy I'm talking about here is firmly grounded in that "Win more when winning, lose less when losing" motto; concatenated winning transactions (sessions) explode the unit value on chained winning sessions, yet in concatenated losing sessions you give the casino minimal value units

i.e. What you make in a single session with inflated units, might take the casino ten "sessions from hell" of minimal units for them to have it back. You are creating a disparity in units during the strategy's good times, aiming for it not to equate to what the bad times can take in the same playing length. All geared to maximizing profits as well as your chance to stay in game, beyond an unique bank's fate.

Quote from: Albalaha on March 28, 2013, 04:48:47 AMWe are not into Hogwarts school of magic.

Are you sure? The simple fact of declaring an officially unbeatable game as beatable is considered to be an "out of proportion magic" itself.

As to whether it is feasible to start with plenty of small units, compound Interest does the trick.

http://news.morningstar.com/classroom2/course.asp?docId=142858&page=2&CN=

The beauty of small banks is you have more cushion. 1000 = a single gaming unit. Inflexible, harder to compound. 100 units = 10 gaming units to use, adapt and act as cushion in between the player and the total risk or ruin. Furthermore, it is quicker to multiply base unit banks with smaller 100-unit entities. In gambling having bankrolls is having oxygen. If it were for me I'd use a bankroll of 10 units to compound... (but I'm using single-number strategies, based on 36 unit cycles as a minimum).

...When compounding, more frequent is better. Gladly, in this scenario a transaction generating interest isn't a year of wait as in a bank or 1000's of units to be built, but rather single entities which can be played within shorter spans (within the day), giving the player a better chance for adding up net gains by the compounded interest at an accelerated pace.

"Would you rather have $10,000 per day for 30 days or a penny that doubled in value every day for 30 days?"

Those who don't choose the penny may need to seek other venues

QuoteYou can not chose a "better" betselection

We can agree to disagree here.

I've seen with my own eyes bet selection makes a difference. "Farting" numbers versus carefully choosing bets according to current conditions certainly contrast.

Any case, I'm about to "dance naked" for the public eye to see with my betting tool. Everyone can see if flat has advantage under this light or not.

Quote from: Albalaha on March 28, 2013, 04:24:00 AMIf u  want to earn a million with a real holy grail, you need to risk at least half of that from your own pocket.

Our ways to face the game are certainly different. It is my opinion the better your strategy, the lesser your initial bankroll should be.

If your strategy works, you should actually start with the very very minimal unit, then start compounding in the grounds of your positively crafted bet in order to make your base unit grow over time.

Risking half a million to make a million doesn't sound like a solidly based strategy to me.

Well, in any case, there's enough "space" for all approaches. Each person comes closer to the tree (strategy) that gives the best shade according to him/her. We all know "best" is quite subjective. To some people "best" even means risking all your lifetime bankroll in one single roll. Let's be smarter than that when making our strategic play. Picking your bets can make a difference. Compounding and smart inter-session money management can make a difference too.

Unless you have the "motor" of the operation right (your bet/selection) the rest will have it quite hard to work on its own. Even when you have a solid progression/money management, you can always help it perform more fitting with a better-delivering selection; don't scratch smarter betting at once.

Regards.

Quote from: Albalaha on March 28, 2013, 03:02:59 AM
Victor, in my humble opinion:
1) It is not possible to keep on winning with flat bet only.

Dear Sumit, thanks for your participation.

I agree all single triggers per se are completely doomed flat betting them mechanically.

This fact does not rule-out a flat betting strategy based on timing. Having all the degrees of freedom the unfolding game might need, exercising the right to modify your bets under a conscious way, in real-time.

Nobody forces a person to continue using what isn't delivering at the moment.

In this short-circuited game when a certain something is not appearing even once, it means something else is appearing twice or more.

The smart strategy accounts for this fact, even the one that is flat.