Thanks TC.


Very appreciated! 

Ideally your method is one with a strong "spring-back value". This is, the method's ability to bounce back from deficit to plus.


If you want to have the best "spring-back shot" for the least invested money I'd advice to use reversed progressions.


I'm sure some may have this already figured, but for most this is new territory -including myself-; perhaps Bayes may help math-wise regarding maximizing the chance for reinvestments of recovered units to effectively "patching" the bank.


Knock his door, he's known to be open and willing to help

Hugo Chávez, president of Venezuela, dies in Caracas
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/05/hugo-chavez-dies-cuba

As far your "casino friend" is concerned, your proxy friend doesn't exist. But I wouldn't advice you to tell them 


The bankroll back can make a difference. Having a % of your bankroll back assists in giving more cushion against "Risk of Ruin", this is, the point of total wipeout is placed father behind as lost money is put back into game again. This can be crucial to assist in high fluctuation times. Assuming your game is solid, this recovered % gives more room for fluctuation and a "bounce-back" to bankroll's good health.

Quote from: esoito on March 04, 2013, 10:23:46 PMWhat is it that underpins trends in this instance?  What is the X-Factor at work?

As the game of Roulette is in principle Chaotic (not random), under such light the X-factor has been named "attractor" (see Basin of Attraction):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basin_of_attraction

Basically, we don't deal with unbound variables, but we can't exactly underpin their swaying.

If the game were truly random there wouldn't be anything particularly expected out of it. We say Roulette is a chaotic system because even as knowing its configuration on a given moment doesn't enable you to predict its future state, the movement of the values is not entirely random; they tend toward certain values which keep an established trajectory. Attractors are responsible for keeping variables tending towards their established trajectory (this is what we call trends, the clumping can be seen as a "correction"). Even so, we can't predict the several oscillations of values  which variables might have when transversing the path established by the attractors.

Such a Chaotic system is advantageous to the house since while the overall values are already known, the variations in the ebb and flow to get there are not. The house is not unintelligent to put their money on truly unbound random. This is the big confusion regarding the "limits of random". "Random" does NOT has limits, Chaotic systems do because of attractors.

---

Player-wise, correction points can be seen as the few points for the player to exploit (correction). As well as the random walks which will be scheduled to be corrected at a later time (positive trending).

Vic

Good idea Chris,


Yet by the sample you can really know where it's leaning eh!

Even if only to do it as a "safety net" for yourself it looks appealing.

Of course, hypothetically... I'm not saying one should do it. In any case, I can see such scenario as:

Step 1: Register as an affiliate (so the checks are in your name).

Step 2: Fund and use a friend of you as a "Gaming Proxy". Use his computer remotely.

Step 3: If you win, you get 100% via the proxy player's account. If you lose, you get a % of your losses back as your commission.

It would be Casino Number Reader + Tracker with alarm. (LoL, as far as I know there's no official name for it. We use clicker for a program that clicks, so maybe "alarmer" )

Your best bet right now is contacting Stef/Nick; or Maybe Superman can make a space for you? I'm out of the private coding scene for personal reasons ... Hey! Talk to the fellows. Coders are generally good folk.

It shouldn't be harder than using 75% of a bot (number reader, tracker) and making it play an MP3/WAV sound instead of the last stage (clicking).

Hope you get your idea implemented at an affordable price.

Cheers!
Vic

Quote from: esoito on February 25, 2013, 04:04:10 AM
Why has this discussion morphed into bonuses??

The thread started with a proposal regarding affiliates.

Fair questioning; the thread has been split.

Dublinbet isn't fond of professional players or bonus baggers.

Read item #7 from their bonus terms: http://www.dublinbet.com/help/bonus_terms.html

QuoteBonuses offered by dublinbet are intended for genuine recreational players only. Abuse of the bonus offer will not be tolerated. dublinbet reserves the right to investigate, cancel, suspend or lock any account if bonus abuse is suspected. At our discretion, all bonuses and subsequent gaming activity may be revoked and voided, and deposits returned. Professional players or players we determine to be abusing the bonus offers may face additional restrictions and/or lockouts. Limit one bonus per household.

Well, at least they acknowledge there are PRO's

Quote from: albalaha on February 24, 2013, 05:44:33 AM
How do u count distance? clockwise or anticlockwise?

At your choice.


It's just a matter of subtracting the lower number from the higher to get the distance.

Quote from: ignatus on February 24, 2013, 02:21:19 PM
Interesting. What are your results playing this?

This is merely an aid for manual tracking. The actual method as per the player's choice

Well, I can't speak for every forum owner but when I was the admin at the other forums I only received offers for banner ads and casino promotions (bonus, specials for members).


Never have I given nor will give email addresses for casinos to spam.


I have been victim of casino spam myself. Gladly gmail is an ace at spotting those "Victor, a XYZ% bonus is waiting for you" type of messages 

http://www.dublinbet.com/promotions/

The exploit was with the "Refer-a-friend" promo.

They must have countered it by now. Some Croatia guys were doing it. You needed to sign-up under their link and bet as told via chat. If lucky, then split the earnings. If not lucky, losses were minimal.

I've been out of those private rings for a long time. I'm not anymore "in the loop", so can't really tell about their current status. I've always turned down the proposals so nobody approaches me with proposals of such kind these days. Better for me as I do want to make things the right way

Back in the day people would abuse dublinbet for their low-wagering-requirement bonuses.


There were even guides passed in the underground (skype, msn) about them.


If I recall right, they were about coordinating efforts betting opposites on several accounts to maximize chances of at least one clearing the bonuses while minimizing real-money losses. I was contacted about them but never really liked exploiting the good fellows at dublin. They put a good operation and don't deserve the treatment. Perhaps william hill... 


I wonder what happened to those bonus abusers? Perhaps they just morphed to affiliate exploiters...  who knows?


Where there's a will, there's a way. Where there's a crack there's a cork    Im' certain there's people out there making this "cashback extra cushion" work for them.

My humble pocket counting device with no movable parts:


http://betselection.cc/straight-up/manual-wheel-pocket-count/


You just need to move your brain cells a little to subtract