Ah! nope dear Max. My kiddo doesn't know Mr. random... (and I'm unclear if I would introduce it to him... I would like him to know Mr. Work and Mrs. Persistence instead).

---

Hey! You gotta give it to Epifanio eh! 

Quote from: esoito on December 13, 2012, 01:37:54 AM
I guess Mr Random is the ultimate dictator.

Mr. Random and his pet Epifanio 

-yes, just kiddin'.

The gist of successful trigger packs is for them to be:

- Streaky triggers with a tendency for long chains of wins, then "dry-outs".

Since they are working together they can cover for each other's "doldrums". If none of them is feeding hits, then the pack is disabled.

or

- Somewhat "Opposite" triggers.

When one is hitting the other is likely to be sleeping and vice versa.

---

...another note: I say "somewhat" because they likely aren't really 100% opposite and do have uncovered numbers, but you should picture them in tune with the concepts of "jump" and "stay" for even chances, dozens, etc..

Was publishing it!

Example of a T-pack with 5 numbers:

- Last repeater number. (1)

- Last "Hole neighbors". (2)

- Largest zone neighbors. (2)

---

Note: a hole neighbor can also be a largest zone neighbor so they can be less numbers, but we still consider it a fiver one.

The concept of "Trigger packs" is simple.

It's an evolution of the multiple methods working together.

This time the winning and losing annotations are given by any of the selected triggers added to the pack.

In other words, a set of triggers are acting as one. You ponder them like one, you use them in unison.

Of course, I'm all-in to ban personal attacks. Providing criticism and testing results of a method has nothing to do with attacking the poster at the personal level 

A public forum without personal attacks is the way to go, and that's where we're heading to

As a fellow friend mentioned he now prefers private groups than open forums, it begs the question: are we better off discussing openly or in private?

As the admin of this forum I am of course biased on the public side, but I do want to know the opinions of the fellows around.

First reason:

- People get introduced to others in the public forums.

Possible new fine contributing members are automatically out of the picture in a private environment. That is detrimental in my view.

Another reason:

- More people is exposed to your ideas, with more personal views available.

Sure in private circles criticism is none. i.e. in numerology groups 31-13 is the bible. Post it in a public forum and you'll get testers giving you factual data of it not being any better than any other combination.

I guess it depends on what you want. A pat on the back or open criticism.

P.S: a mission statement is what rules are made for. It's the ultimate goal of the forum for which rules are made and enforced 


Hence it's important we have one.

Recently a top forum fellow remarked we need a mission statement. I agree.

Please give your own examples.

We are talking about statements like:

"To provide a clean environment for discussion of roulette and gambling"

It is a popup. You might need to whitelist the site with your popup blocker!

Its right next to preview button... 


[attachimg=1]

This log serves to keep precedents and learn what is not acceptable here in our place.

The actual purpose is to remind us we must be mature enough to avoid attacking each other at the personal level.

This is essentially what we want the fine fellows around to internalize:

Quote
[...]people can learn how to respectfully disagree.  They can learn how to question the system and the rules without questioning the intelligence of the poster. 

This topic has been moved to Straight-up.

Thanks for posting it!

http://betselection.cc/index.php?topic=447.0

Thanks for the interest, I'll make some time to drive an example with illustrations up.

The double trio isn't that much of a difficult pattern to grasp once you see it highlighted 

http://uxsoftware.com


Hopefully someone from UX staff gets to register around