Here:

[attachimg=1]

At it...

Quote from: esoito on November 17, 2012, 11:31:51 PM
A shame there's no non-fallacious guarantee that it WILL happen again...

Now I picture you like:

[attachimg=1]

Max El Suave


[Esoito Edit: I have to say he's better looking than I am !!   And, coincidentally, I stopped pipe smoking some years ago! ]

Quote from: VLS on November 17, 2012, 05:09:51 AM
OK, I can write the copy tomorrow, it's past 1 am here.

Written and posted here:

http://betselection.cc/positive/'boom!'-positive-progression/

The "boom" positive progression is intended to exploit the common happening of a location showing multiple times within a cycle.

This is entirely cycle-based, which means you should never deviate from the max. spin that closes it.

You assign the amount of units of a payout to face the cycle.

The basis is that you will re-invest the units won, divided by the number of spins left to cycle-end.

Example: You are betting a single number and get a hit at spin 15.

Cycle = 36
Hit at = 15

36 - 15 = 21

21 is the amount of spins left to sustain the bet.

How much to rise for those spins?

You rise by the result of payout divided by spins left.

In the case of a straight-up number, it is:

(36 * 1) / 21 = 1.71

So you add +1.71 units to your base bet for the rest of the cycle (tops).

1 + 1.71 = 2,71 units on the number now.

Shall you get another hit at -say- spin 23, your accounting will be:

36 - 23 = 13

13 spins to sustain the new bet.

(36 * 2.71) / 13 = 7,50 units on the number.

To be held for the next 13 spins tops.

---

Of course, there is a point in which you must take your wins, so it is advisable to take profits when on the plus, especially when playing several numbers this way at the same time.

At all times you know you are risking EXACTLY one payout of your base unit.

In the case of a single number it is 36 units, but in the event of having concatenated wins in the cycle, the ROI can rise handsomely.

This can be extrapolated to nice-paying locations such as splits or streets. Lower-paying locations do not offer enough for it to really go “boom!”, so you better stick to the higher-paying betting locations when considering this.

Regards.
Vic

P.S. Who knows, eventually there might even be a market for framework modules. Hence, the more coders available, the merrier! 

Hello dear friends,

Just wanted to mention the fine fellows in the forum's software section aren't in direct competition with what I envision and aim for our software offering here.

I aim to create a roulette framework to enable the everyday user to create their own trackers, testers, clickers and bots. A true "do it yourself" set, where the user has pre-set modules at their disposal (the $5.99 part) and they can code the very minimum to achieve by extending it.

This means that I am working hard to *CREATE* able people like nOrMy or Ophis with the least learning curve. If I succeed you'll be able to simply hire the framework for $5.99 and code against it to serve your own needs; without me, Normy nor any other person in between    That's what I aim to attain. To create a product that let users deliver value to themselves; the realization of my motto: "Making a living by helping others achieve".

As far as I know there isn't anything quite like it on the market, not even RX, since while it's true that RX has a scripting language, you are "jailed" with it because you are limited to what RX offers and can't really extend the core feature-set by yourself.

Under the way I'm structuring the framework, you are OPEN to re-using modules from other people, whatever their favorite programming language might be. It's a common API.

So, please let's receive the fellows bringing in their programming skills to our place with arms wide open: we aren't competing. Fellow coders are offering their fine programs; we are ultimately aiming to offer a framework which people can code on their own to become self-sufficient.

Regards.
Vic

GLC, welcome to "Wavelengths United".
People all over the world vibrating at the same tune. Today it was me and you

Quote from: VLS on November 17, 2012, 05:06:51 AM
rise +1 plus "boom!".

Geez, I don't think I've written about the "boom!" positive progression yet.

I can write the copy tomorrow, it's past 1 am here.

...Despite the name it IS a very good cycle-based progressive betting to pump the balances in times of concentration.

Sumit, just one question: can we skip spins?

If so, perhaps the good ol' "only bet what is showing in the current cycle" might be handy, and we never sustain bets on #3 beyond 36 spins, making a pause until next show, using a soft progression, a la rise +1 plus "boom!".

Welcome to the Fray dear George

The fellows around sure are glad to see you here. (count me first!)

Cheers!

Since this is a variable-amount bet, I'd say: Max. Spin up to your personal choice.

Personally, I like to have spins 18, 24 and -tops- 30 as a checkpoint.

I've already learned not to be stubborn a long time ago. Going past the cycle is completely out of the question.

It's indeed very important to know the mathematical and statistical foundations of gambling to know where we're standing.

Section added
http://betselection.cc/math-statistics/

We only want to be in peace...

[attachimg=1]

http://forum.casinos-jackpots.net/


??