Quote from: stringbeanpc on September 29, 2017, 04:13:00 PMWill you provide a list some of these casinos ?

Hello SB, thanks for asking. At this time I'm wary of mentioning any casino directly yet you can always "snoop around" with terms such as:

https://www.google.co.ve/search?q=anonymous+casino

https://www.google.com/search?q=anonymous+casino+bitcoin

...It would be interesting to learn what's the opinion from those having taken the anonymous betting path already. i.e.:

Are these casinos good for "Hit & Run" only? (deposit, win, withdraw -as soon as possible)

Are you okay with leaving a big balance in your anonymous betting account?

I guess trusting the casino itself can be a big issue here. With many of them "popping in and out" of the scene, the most obvious course of action would be compiling a list of anonymous casinos first, then reading enough reviews on the net to asses each "contender" previous to making your deposit; always preferring the most reputable and established one featuring the best track/record regarding payouts.

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 29, 2017, 06:40:47 PM
Ok, I got your point but, the live feed doesn't show how many others (if any) are betting simultaneously, what bets, what amounts...even at a B&M casino when you can see with your own eyes all these you could be "targeted".

I get it too! To me, the only times I the "ghost of being targeted" is when betting with an engorged unit. But even at those times hits come exactly as they should.

It's a live wheel, not an RNG.

I look at it this way. Winning is a deviation on expected losses & "mushrooms" run out. They have to end since winning deviations can't last forever.

When losses catch-up in clump/concentration you better be giving back the least.

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 29, 2017, 06:40:47 PMlet me ask you a question, let's say you have tested a method for 48,640 bets approximately and BR lost only twice during all those bets, how would you feel to lose your BR on the 2nd day of your visit at B&M airball roulette?!

Would that made you suspicious, feel that something is wrong, odd...??

No Angelo. "Anything that can happen will happen". Remember luck is measurable. As a player, I would be more concerned about me experiencing bad streaks on my personal set of actuals across several wheels.

The long run evens-out everything. 3 hits per cycle is an event we all targeted.

Learning not to try being invincible can be a hard lesson to learn; you know you're there when it doesn't matter wether you win or lose a session since you're prepared for the natural events of the game.

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 29, 2017, 06:40:47 PMI'm just trying to explain what I've experienced, whether it's extreme bad luck or cheating is something I'm not 100% certain because I've no evidence but only indications, I cannot initiate a legal case with just my word and indications.

All these and other milder misfortunes enraged me up to the point which I sware to myself to find the ultimate strategy in order to take a share of their money almost at will.
I take cheating very, very seriously, not only because of what I've experienced but also because of my principles/mentality.

You're a persistent fellow so you have the #1 requirement nailed to achieve your goal (Just don't be blinded and learn to pressing when you have to press and "letting go" when you have to )

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 29, 2017, 06:40:47 PMPS The single number method which you've mentioned Vic deserves more attention and its own thread.

We had in the past. Former versions covered way too many numbers and entered into what a fellow forumer Mrs called "panic mode" (due to the current numerical filters not being in place). Now, this evolved version is just a very discreet profit-sharing venture some close friends enter and exit from.

You can have a shot at it of course.  You would do as many tests as you want independently. Hey! If you have some time to burn we can set you up as long as you report in the open. It may spice things up around

I'm not against others using it as long as it's via discreet profit-sharing. We can always use a bit more $ sponsored by casino winnings.

(If you see it isn't suitable for you, then nothing happens; there's no money lost of course since testing amicably is obviously granted for free)

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 29, 2017, 05:01:42 PMOf course when you bet only 1 number you have no time issue but not everybody bets like this.

I know, hence the emphasis on it being what I've experienced.

The method is actually the Roulette Betting Tool. An evolved one. I'm not developing it any longer. Some players expect too much from one number to be honest. Losing a session bank shouldn't be a catastrophic event. This possibly deserves a thread of its own. Losing some consecutive cycles can be even thought as normal and expected. You wouldn't cry foul on red or black skipping 6 spins -three (3) even chance cycles- but people call "garbage" when not hitting a proportionally-conservative amount of spins in cycles.

I stopped "peddling" it to others. I'm not going back to large numerical coverage for real money. I post new approaches and methods for public consideration yet my approach is already set. Can't refine to a lesser coverage from one number

As to the money management, it's the 75% Money Management.

It allows for an organic growth of your unit value while losing minimal-unit banks when things aren't rosy.

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 29, 2017, 05:01:42 PMSpeaking about edge it comes only from selection, not the progressions and the money managements!
People who claim otherwise they know stuff about what's going on...yes, I'm using progression but it's not the reason I win regularly.

I'm with you to a certain extent. I've experienced carefully-crafted money management schemes making a difference, but still agree full consideration is needed as to when to place your bets.

In my view, I would say it's the COMBINATION of both a conscious bet selection + a conscious money management which can make a true difference.

Recently, there was a small revival of interest on Bayes' "distributions" view on which you participated. I'm with Bayes too. When you have the bet selection that fits the ebb and flow required for a certain money management, magic happens.

"Win more when winning, lose less when losing". This has been said by other members in the past. I recall Albalaha/Sumit evangelizing on it but nobody paid a deserving attention.

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 29, 2017, 05:01:42 PMsince you are playing a single number you should know that none of them endures long term but all of them do...;-)

They cycle. Yep.

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 29, 2017, 05:01:42 PMCheers, to your success!

Angelo, I'm a recreational player because I don't have the "physical advantage-play certificate" Bias or VB players have, but I consider myself as "doing right" on the game. Since my goal is to beat my "lifetime actuals" spins, I don't need to worry about the rest of spins appearing out there.

I'm happy and focused on beating the very set destiny throws my way

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 29, 2017, 05:01:42 PMOr should I say: e viva est mucho alegria!

Cheers to you too
Vic

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 29, 2017, 03:25:17 PMEvery single spin from all sessions was bet

Hello dear Angelo, my very personal point of view here (perhaps we need a separate thread for these replies).

I feel comfortable with live wheels in general because you are betting alongside a pool of bettors.

There are instances of some live wheel video feeds shared among several casinos. How can the live wheel operator target you specifically?

Of course, I'm not ruling-out other ways to cheat outside tampering with the live feed (i.e. not accepting bets on time, denying payout) but I'm very careful about calling "cheat" on a live casino wheel these days.

Again, I'm just expressing my very personal point of view based on my personal experience. As mentioned above, I'm using a single-location method which bets every spin after the initial number-collection cycle happens; that's likely relevant to your continuous-betting remark.

In my case, after the location-adding & filtering takes place, only one number is picked. Perhaps this qualifies as "Low profile" by itself... just a player betting on a hunch(?)... The selection process even uses a degree of randomness for locations with "equal weight" on the timeline for the current spin, so no single session is equal.

I feel comfortable the casino isn't after me as I'm not specifically betting a preconceived pattern.

The casino isn't the enemy: No casino means no opportunity to bet my friend.

Live casino wheel is my favorite. I'm actually grateful for them setting up this opportunity: to play an actual physical wheel from the comfort of home in my houseclothes, mind you

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 29, 2017, 02:47:06 PMYou are speaking like you admire them, why don't you open a casino in order to materialize the only edge you know Vic?!

Hello Angelo, sorry if that sounded bad. I'm just stating a fact my amigo: when dealing with spins per hour, anything that benefits the casino also benefits the advantage player too since any "side" having an advantage gets to express it faster as well.

Please humbly allow me to bring a very important point as a context since you're mentioning me in your post directly : may I mention I'm only betting one (1) single betting location per spin these days; so -if it were up to me- the betting time could as well be 5 seconds and I'd be even happier to be honest.

Fast live wheels are precisely my dreamy scenario since chances are they aren't targeting me specifically given the numerical stream is "shared" among all players.

As to the betting itself, I start with a minimum-unit bet because under my betting framework it needs to build. If the method doesn't have "build potential" (i.e. requiring the pouring of more and more units without an organic raise) it's simply discarded.

Remember the "Mushroom" term referred by Norman Leigh? While it is commonly attached to the reverse Labouchere, I reckon we may also call this clumping of multiple winning as being a "Mushroom" too.

You should lose/give back in these minimal-unit banks while growing your base unit when being successful. Like Manrique would say, when it is "your time".

The more spins per hour, the more chances to experience such a "mushroom" during your session, which according to my framework should be the actual goal of your playing efforts. Clumping, mushrooms, growing the base unit organically while using a conscious inter-session money management.

It's actually not a matter of time between bets but a matter of spins being played and -of course- whether you can express your advantage within them.

Cheers!
Vic

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 21, 2017, 09:04:20 AMWhy do you think this pattern occurred during the last few years at online casinos?

When you have the advantage, more spins per hour mean more profit. Directly.

...Personally, I'd name "efficiency" as the key word for this pattern

Interesting concept being applied by some casinos.

You only need an email address as proof of account so you don't need to forward your personal data.

They use Bitcoin and other Crypto-currencies.

What do you think about this mode of betting online?

Hello GJ, Esoito/Max has a point. People around may not be familiar with the terms used at the Bitcoin scene. Chances are an introduction to the terms may be welcome

Thanks for the cautionary tale

Like a fellow with some common sense inside would say: "You don't sell the holy grail, you use it".

(You can never repeat it enough to people...)

Quote from: greenguy on September 25, 2017, 12:00:35 PMI don't believe there is anything unusual about low levels of participation rates for forums in general.

Indeed, there are times where "discussion" (as a whole) slows down -or even halts- at the forums. Life comes in cycles; forums -as a part of life- come in cycles too

Quote from: greenguy on September 25, 2017, 12:00:35 PMJust my opinion, of course.

We try to be balanced with members. Please receive public apologies if you have felt it to be too harsh on you.

Also, do feel free to elaborate to your heart's content at the rules thread for the forum's reboot:

http://betselection.cc/betselection-is/betselection-is-*rules*/

We have a malleable blank slate with our site's reboot so this is a good moment for all of us to mend and actively prepare a better place for our interactions.

Thanks for participating. We're stuck together so we better treat each other with love

Vic

Hello there GJ, please introduce yourself a bit more before shooting the link!

Kindly tell us more about the site and your involvement with it

Thanks!

Thank you for the insightful replies!

Yes, while you see the same patterns on RNG and Live (according to numbers covered & spins experienced) there's always the ghost of "possible manipulation" when you're not playing at a provably fair casino ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provably_fair ) which is why I'd also like to ask what's the status on the 0.10 live tables with one (1) cent chip?

i.e. Live tables allowing 0.10 (ten cents) minimal bet while still having 0.01 (one cent) chip so you can play with -say- 0.17 but can't play 0.07.

If the method is good, it doesn't matter if you play it with $0.10, $1 or $100 as a betting unit. Your destiny is growing your bank 

Shoot it! Faucets are an interesting concept in the bitcoin arena.

Do you know which online casinos offer one cent roulette (0.01c) these days?

Both RNG + Live.

Welcome back to the saddle Petr

BetVoyager No-Zero is a conscious RNG choice.