Hello guys, I'm providing these releases for the community to get familiar with our BetSoftware Framework, ask questions about it and post feedback.

Release:

[attachimg=1]

Download: [attachmini=2]

---

Usage is very simple:

1) Start BetSoftware_loader.exe
2) Select the module(s) on the list, click add.
3) Once added, hit the "Launch" button.

---

This release has two single modules: An Euro Felt + History list. This way you can't go wrong.

Enjoy! and feel free to provide your valuable feedback!

Vic

@Turner

I am not in favor of goodbyes nor disconnecting from love. Miracle, odd-defying, events happen each and every day & night at the many tables in the world. What's one more for you? 

Live good, for as long as possible. Live great, as intense as possible. Live peacefully, as internally happy as possible.

...Every day in happiness is heaven. We are already having heaven in our lives here and now. No need to reach out.

Peace in love
Vic

hahaha, "Hit & Run Vampire"


Now that's a catchy phrase 

I join Proof's post in best wishes.


Have a very Merry Christmas this year 2013.

In this special time of the year may you be surrounded by the people you love and by those who love you the most.


Me, my wife and Vic Jr. wish you and yours the best time.


[attachimg=1]


Vic & Family

Quote from: Albalaha on December 23, 2013, 03:51:51 AM
Say,
I am betting on Red only and targeting two consecutive wins on that. What is the longest stretch of no such hits on any EC, this way?

Dear Sumit, the expected rate's Math is exactly as a single occurrence. My best guess is it's around the "less-than-twenty-times the cycle universe" rule*, which propagates throughout the game.

So with an universe of 2, you have 2 per cycle x 20 = at most 39 times ever recorded in live game conditions.

---

*: Please note in simulated TRNG anything goes; that "rule" (with quotes) goes for the regular player facing regular game speed in casino conditions.

Merry Christmas dear Proof & forum 

Norm, check your PM's

Welcome back GG.

QuoteThe coloring of the rainbow is nothing more than a shared (reliable, consistent, and kick-behind) illusion.

Reminds me of this particular quote:

"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."

-- Albert Einstein

Quote from: esoito on December 14, 2013, 11:55:12 PMIt's all a matter of perception, really.

Colors don't exist, they are only perceived.

http://www.askamathematician.com/2012/06/q-do-colors-exist/

Original public domain image for our icon at:

http://www.wpclipart.com/science/atoms_molecules/atom.png.html

Quote from: Abc123 on December 08, 2013, 02:38:19 PMCould somebody tell me where I can find more information?

Good and bad news here.

a) Availability of information depends on what programming language you are aiming to use.

b) There are no "official" tutorials on bot making per se. Every programmer usually makes his own ways using the information for the "building parts" that compound the bot (i.e. there's a plethora of image recognition info and whitepapers, a plethora of raw WIN32 API programming sites including MSDN -invaluable!-, a plethora of separated tutorials published in different for each language -C/VB/Delphi/Etc).

---

There's a project for an easy-to-extend public-domain bot at: BetSoftware

(in the same note)
...A person winning his entire lifetime in the casino with the martingale didn't win, he only had a life-lasting "fluke" 

Quote from: VLS on December 14, 2013, 11:03:52 AMNow, whether it wins or not is debatable.

Because even the holy of holiest method anyone in our mankind can find is prone to failure when facing infinity. (Just run a 24/7 True Random Number Generator with enough computing power and see).

But still, is IS a winning system for the person using it during his/her lifetime for extracting money out of the casino consistently. Both concepts are and aren't at the same time. Depending on who you are.

“There is no truth. There is only perception.”

― Gustave Flaubert

This is the epitome of a gambling-related quote.

With as many ways to track the same events as people can figure-out, we can say none of the events exist in reality; they are only perceived. But at the same time, ALL the events exist because they are real events to each of the trackers/observers.

So the next time somebody tells you there is no system, you can tell them your system does exist. Now, whether it wins or not is debatable. When dealing with infinity everything is, and everything isn't (at the same time).

Having said that, it is better to use a point of reference for our perceptions when trying to understand an infinite stream of numbers than nothing.

Just like in space's infinity there is no sense of up or down, above or below or anything else regarding direction and yet we use points of reference, in the unlimited flow of numerical events of randomness it is perfectly valid to use our very own directional ways.

...Don't put down someone else's systems/ways so easily. They are as valid as the other way around:

[attachimg=1]