Thank you Montanoz.


Our fellow moderator Bayes will be the one testing it.


(I have enough on my plate already!)


Cheers.

Glad to hear that. I'm always willing to assist.

P.S. it can as well be a single street coming out intermittently 1 hit, 2 skips, 1 hit, 2 skips, like clockwork... or a split not missing -say- more than 5 spins getting spun. As long as the sticky occurrence has been running within half or more spins from the payout several times already, you can consider risking an extra bit on it.

This refers simply to "expect the unexpected, acting on it".

i.e. if - for instance - a double street is hitting like crazy and it recently spun 4 hits in a row, making you pass your win-goal, you might try holding the bet on it. It might go to 6, 7 or more hits in a row. You might want to put one chip on it for the next bet, if no win, then cut the betting on it. If it continues to hit, you squeeze it until the catch deviation stop.

This is a "human-based loop", so to speak. Some room for human consideration, because at times the opportunities appear and we can certainly act on them, not just telling "oh it went 30 times in a row" after it happened.

When we are sailing the rivers of a betting session, we seek to catch what's there. We don't base our betting in having it go 30 times, but we can spot a good streak in the making and capitalize.

Hope it helps.

Thank you Nick.

Hi Pri, hopefully I can answer with the new Felt tag for a proper spin-to-spin viewing with the locations highlighted as they are bet.

Here's hoping sponsorships unfold greatly so we can have it in no time [smiley]pidgin/pidginthumbsup.gif[/smiley]

"You have to bet what is showing, instead of what you think might show"

The name of the game for timeline-based play is: CONTINUATION.

You have a betting template (whatever it is: Kimo's matrix, A standard wheel disc or your custom-made betting template) and you only bet for the events you are witnessing to replicate.

Always keep in mind roulette is a game without theoretical limits. You should never bet against it... past a very defined "attack zone".

You must have your set of spotted events/patters/triggers and only enable them after the game realizes one, and you stick to it for the whole duration of the cycle.

Remember for simplicity a cycle is derived from the payout. i.e. 12 spins for streets, 6 spins for a double-street, 9 spins for a square, 3 spins for a dozen...

You need to use a "rolling window" comprising no more than the length of the cycle for your target location.

(You see me talking about 37-spin a lot lately because I'm betting straight-up numbers)

Don't worry about collisions. Even if you are betting 2 or 3 locations you should account for the cycle of each one for considerations regarding how much to hold its actual bet.

SO:

- You have an arsenal of recurrently spotted events in your template.
- You only pick them AFTER they realize for the current cycle (your "rolling window").
- You hold the bets no more than one cycle for the location. If there is no hit past this cycle, you disable it.

* as a special option you should be OK with holding a bet active for as many cycles as required shall you encounter a "random walk" in progress.

That's continuation at its best.

Vic

Hello Pri, what you're talking about is known as Maximum Drawdown play. A smart way to bet with methods who tend to go in long streaks -be it positive or negative.

With it, any unit won is used to thwart losses automatically. i.e. if you bankroll is 100 and you won +25, you can only lose -75 as maximum for the session.

It is a good way with the right bet [smiley]pidgin/pidginthumbsup.gif[/smiley]. No harm in testing it [smiley]pidgin/pidginsmile.gif[/smiley]

Breaking even is very important for the savvy player.

It is inherent in every player to make the goal to have as much WON sessions as possible, but if not attainable in a certain day then BREAKING EVEN is the best stopping point.

Think of the bigger picture.

You didn't lose, so there's no negative impact in your session-to-session scorecard nor in your pocket. Your units are safe with you for a new battle.

Remember: in the monthly balance there's no difference between a unit won and a unit saved.

Repeaters always seemed to me as one out-of-control creature.


The game is guaranteed to behave in an exact way (equalizing) in the long run, but in the short run, these "short-term extremes", from which repeaters are a clear example, might be the only thing for the player to try to capitalize upon, since they are the only thing that the casino can't control.


Spot & capitalize 'em!

Pri, maybe good ol' VB6 can come to the rescue. VB6's executables are certainly Win32 compliant.

Esoito has a link to what seems an "open" version of it.

Quote from: 6th-sense on July 11, 2013, 03:32:32 PM
thanks Victor

My pleasure.


Looking forward to your blog posts 

Nice to see you around 6th, you blog is here:

http://betselection.cc/6th-sense/

Best wishes. Enjoy!
Vic

Priyanka is correct.

The full/expanded version of the initials is:

LD = Hit on any of the Last Two Dozens spun = win.
JD = Jump to any of the other Two dozens excluding the last one spun = win.

Hope it helps. Anything, continue making clever questions, I'll give a shot at giving you proper answers!

(P.S: a clever question is one where the person is obviously making an effort to understand. i.e. "I was listening to the explanation and couldn't get why over here it doesn't add up." [smiley]aes/wine.png[/smiley] Just like Sam's doing it!)

QuoteVic, could we reprise the "VLS LW Methodology"?

Yep!