Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
Recent posts
#1
AsymBacGuy / Re: Why bac could be beatable ...
Last post by alrelax - Today at 03:10:14 AMQuoteWhat's this (I mean the numbers)?
1-10 (Strong and Follow whatever is appearing)
11-16 (Stronger or Immediately turning weak and follow)
as.
The numbers represent Hands 1-10 and Hands 11-16 (although probably should be 11-20).
I have witnessed the highest amount of strong hands/events occurring from jump street within the shoe, as well as subsiding.
That is where I get those two sets of hands occurring.
#2
AsymBacGuy / Re: Why bac could be beatable ...
Last post by AsymBacGuy - Yesterday at 08:12:30 PMWhat's this (I mean the numbers)?
1-10 (Strong and Follow whatever is appearing)
11-16 (Stronger or Immediately turning weak and follow)
as.
1-10 (Strong and Follow whatever is appearing)
11-16 (Stronger or Immediately turning weak and follow)
as.
#3
AsymBacGuy / Re: Why bac could be beatable ...
Last post by alrelax - September 09, 2024, 03:45:07 AMMy way of picking out extremes. Don't care what they are, chops, streaks, doubles, 1s and 2s, etc., etc.
Set aside all fallacy, all statistics and all of your desires of what should or shouldn't work, as follows:
Apply 0-1-2-3 Low Tie
Just One More
Equalization
1's and 2's
Bead Plate (Follow with the appearing right side)
1-10 (Strong and Follow whatever is appearing)
11-16 (Stronger or Immediately turning weak and follow)
Half'ish' Changes (Follow or Not. Be prepared)
The above 8 are the most common and in my best interest the highest majority of the times to follow and wager with.
Set aside all fallacy, all statistics and all of your desires of what should or shouldn't work, as follows:
Apply 0-1-2-3 Low Tie
Just One More
Equalization
1's and 2's
Bead Plate (Follow with the appearing right side)
1-10 (Strong and Follow whatever is appearing)
11-16 (Stronger or Immediately turning weak and follow)
Half'ish' Changes (Follow or Not. Be prepared)
The above 8 are the most common and in my best interest the highest majority of the times to follow and wager with.
#4
AsymBacGuy / Re: Why bac could be beatable ...
Last post by alrelax - September 09, 2024, 03:06:10 AMOMG, I most certainly 1,000,000% believe you!
#5
AsymBacGuy / Re: Why bac could be beatable ...
Last post by AsymBacGuy - September 09, 2024, 03:02:59 AMQuoteAs you said:
"Extremes" rarely happening make the fortune of recreational players or of those very rare acute players capable to ride those unlikely situations; everything different than that will make the casinos' fortune or creating the basis where professionals will make money."
Yes, 'extremes' most certainly come and go with no protocols except gut feelings the highest majority of the times. I have made handsome amounts of money when most others were either losing or stumbling enormously on the 'extremes'.
One has to have a totally clear as well as a neutral mind-set when at the felt. There is no other way, IMO.
Maybe you won't believe me, but almost half of our strategy is based upon the importance of exploiting some "extremes" as several times you pointed out here.
as.
#6
AsymBacGuy / Re: Why bac could be beatable ...
Last post by AsymBacGuy - September 09, 2024, 02:57:44 AMPer every three C/I patterns considered, the mathematical probability of encountering three homogeneous C or I patterns is 2/8 (0.25%); on the other end when we're looking for a C-C or I-I subsequence happening at a 3-step scenario is 6/8 (0.75%).
Notice that a C/I proposition is quite different than a simple B/P proposition, because in the former situation more hands are needed to form a classifiable event (C or I).
Moreover many intertwined unclassifiable hands are just considered as "neutral".
The same about long clusters we're not interested to chase (for now).
Example.
We just take care of doubles as opposed as superior streaks (3/3+ streaks we name as S here).
A #1 shoe went as 2-2-2-2-2-2-S-S-S-2-2-2-S-2:
Doubles: C-C
Superior streaks: C-I
Both streaks considered: C-C-C-I
Now a more likely #2 shoe as:
S-2-S-S-2-2-S-2-S-S-S-2-2-2-2
Doubles: I-C-I-C
Superior streaks: I-C-I-C
Both streaks considered: I-I-C-C-I-I-C-C
Now a kind of opposite #3 shoe than the previous one:
2-2-S-2-2-2-S-2-2-S-2-2-2-2
Doubles: C-C-C-C
Superior streaks: I-I-I
Both streaks considered: C-I-C-I-C-I-C
In total and assuming a player will bet toward the same C or I scenario already happened we'll get:
1st shoe, doubles: +1,
1st shoe superior streaks: -1
1st shoe both streaks: +1
2nd shoe doubles: -3
2nd shoe superior streaks: -3
2nd shoe both streaks: +4
3rd shoe doubles: +1
3rd shoe superior streaks: +1
3rd shoe both streaks: -6
Look about how is relatively easy to follow a pattern even though the examples were made upon a doubles > superior streaks temporarily and unlikely propensity (when a proper random walk is utilized).
Let's make a real example. We'll take care about the cockroach road doubles and superior streaks distribution. (Many starting and ending hands are cut off from the registration).
D= doubles, S=superior streaks B=both streaks
D: C-I
S: I-C
B: C-I-I-C
D: I-I-I
S: C-C-I-I
D: C-I-C-I-I-I-I
D: C-I-I
S: I-I-C
B: I-C-I-I-C-I
D: C-C-C
S: I-I
B: C-I-C-I-C
D: C
S: C-C
B: C-C-C
D: I-C
S: C-C
B: I-C-C
D: C
S: C-C
B: C-C
D: C-C-C
S: I-I-I
B: I-C-I-C-I-C
D: I-C-I
S: C-I-C
B: C-I-I-C-C-I
D: I-I
S: C-I
B: C-I-I-I
D: C-C
S: C-I
B: C-C-C-I
D: I-C
S: I-I
B: I-I-C-I
D: C-I
S: I-I
B: I-C-I-I
D: C-C
S: C-C
B: C-C-C
D: C-C-C
S: C
B: C-C-C
D: I-C-C
S: C-C
B: I-C-C-C-C
D: I-C
S: I
B: I-I-C
D: I-I-C-C
S: C-I-I
B: I-C-I-I-C-I-C
Easy to find out the line where C or I symbols tend to get the greatest amount of shifts or the most limited homogeneous back to back patterns.
as.
Notice that a C/I proposition is quite different than a simple B/P proposition, because in the former situation more hands are needed to form a classifiable event (C or I).
Moreover many intertwined unclassifiable hands are just considered as "neutral".
The same about long clusters we're not interested to chase (for now).
Example.
We just take care of doubles as opposed as superior streaks (3/3+ streaks we name as S here).
A #1 shoe went as 2-2-2-2-2-2-S-S-S-2-2-2-S-2:
Doubles: C-C
Superior streaks: C-I
Both streaks considered: C-C-C-I
Now a more likely #2 shoe as:
S-2-S-S-2-2-S-2-S-S-S-2-2-2-2
Doubles: I-C-I-C
Superior streaks: I-C-I-C
Both streaks considered: I-I-C-C-I-I-C-C
Now a kind of opposite #3 shoe than the previous one:
2-2-S-2-2-2-S-2-2-S-2-2-2-2
Doubles: C-C-C-C
Superior streaks: I-I-I
Both streaks considered: C-I-C-I-C-I-C
In total and assuming a player will bet toward the same C or I scenario already happened we'll get:
1st shoe, doubles: +1,
1st shoe superior streaks: -1
1st shoe both streaks: +1
2nd shoe doubles: -3
2nd shoe superior streaks: -3
2nd shoe both streaks: +4
3rd shoe doubles: +1
3rd shoe superior streaks: +1
3rd shoe both streaks: -6
Look about how is relatively easy to follow a pattern even though the examples were made upon a doubles > superior streaks temporarily and unlikely propensity (when a proper random walk is utilized).
Let's make a real example. We'll take care about the cockroach road doubles and superior streaks distribution. (Many starting and ending hands are cut off from the registration).
D= doubles, S=superior streaks B=both streaks
D: C-I
S: I-C
B: C-I-I-C
D: I-I-I
S: C-C-I-I
D: C-I-C-I-I-I-I
D: C-I-I
S: I-I-C
B: I-C-I-I-C-I
D: C-C-C
S: I-I
B: C-I-C-I-C
D: C
S: C-C
B: C-C-C
D: I-C
S: C-C
B: I-C-C
D: C
S: C-C
B: C-C
D: C-C-C
S: I-I-I
B: I-C-I-C-I-C
D: I-C-I
S: C-I-C
B: C-I-I-C-C-I
D: I-I
S: C-I
B: C-I-I-I
D: C-C
S: C-I
B: C-C-C-I
D: I-C
S: I-I
B: I-I-C-I
D: C-I
S: I-I
B: I-C-I-I
D: C-C
S: C-C
B: C-C-C
D: C-C-C
S: C
B: C-C-C
D: I-C-C
S: C-C
B: I-C-C-C-C
D: I-C
S: I
B: I-I-C
D: I-I-C-C
S: C-I-I
B: I-C-I-I-C-I-C
Easy to find out the line where C or I symbols tend to get the greatest amount of shifts or the most limited homogeneous back to back patterns.
as.
#7
AsymBacGuy / Re: Why bac could be beatable ...
Last post by alrelax - September 09, 2024, 01:18:23 AMAs you said:
"Extremes" rarely happening make the fortune of recreational players or of those very rare acute players capable to ride those unlikely situations; everything different than that will make the casinos' fortune or creating the basis where professionals will make money."
Yes, 'extremes' most certainly come and go with no protocols except gut feelings the highest majority of the times. I have made handsome amounts of money when most others were either losing or stumbling enormously on the 'extremes'.
One has to have a totally clear as well as a neutral mind-set when at the felt. There is no other way, IMO.
"Extremes" rarely happening make the fortune of recreational players or of those very rare acute players capable to ride those unlikely situations; everything different than that will make the casinos' fortune or creating the basis where professionals will make money."
Yes, 'extremes' most certainly come and go with no protocols except gut feelings the highest majority of the times. I have made handsome amounts of money when most others were either losing or stumbling enormously on the 'extremes'.
One has to have a totally clear as well as a neutral mind-set when at the felt. There is no other way, IMO.
#8
Wagering & Intricacies / Re: Reality Advantaged Winning...
Last post by alrelax - September 09, 2024, 01:10:30 AMTo Recap. Reality on the Felt.
Set aside all fallacy, all statistics and all of your desires of what should or shouldn't work.
Apply 0-1-2-3 Low Tie
Just One More
Equalization
1's and 2's
Bead Plate (Follow with the appearing right side)
1-10 (Strong and Follow whatever is appearing)
11-16 (Stronger or Immediately turning weak and follow)
Half'ish' Changes (Follow or Not. Be prepared)
The above 8 are the most common and in my best interest the highest majority of the times to follow and wager with.
Set aside all fallacy, all statistics and all of your desires of what should or shouldn't work.
Apply 0-1-2-3 Low Tie
Just One More
Equalization
1's and 2's
Bead Plate (Follow with the appearing right side)
1-10 (Strong and Follow whatever is appearing)
11-16 (Stronger or Immediately turning weak and follow)
Half'ish' Changes (Follow or Not. Be prepared)
The above 8 are the most common and in my best interest the highest majority of the times to follow and wager with.
#9
General Discussion / Atlantic City dismantles homel...
Last post by alrelax - September 08, 2024, 11:34:02 PMTotally unbelievable!!
But on the other hand, why not??
https://nypost.com/2024/09/08/us-news/atlantic-city-dismantles-homeless-encampment-apartments-beneath-boardwalk-where-beer-was-on-tap-and-pizzas-were-delivered/
But on the other hand, why not??
https://nypost.com/2024/09/08/us-news/atlantic-city-dismantles-homeless-encampment-apartments-beneath-boardwalk-where-beer-was-on-tap-and-pizzas-were-delivered/
#10
AsymBacGuy / Re: Why bac could be beatable ...
Last post by AsymBacGuy - September 08, 2024, 08:43:40 PMBasically for any two A/B opposed events considered there are only two different statistical shapes showing up along any shoe dealt:
C= clustered (AA.. or BB..)
I= isolated (AB or BA)
Thus and by now the clusters lenght won't be taken into account here.
So AAAA or AA or BBBBB or BB will be ALL clustered apparition.
Say we want to classify three C or I patterns in a row, of course we'll have 8 possible patterns:
1) CCC
2) CCI
3) CIC
4) CII
5) III
6) IIC
7) ICI
8.) ICC
In essence per each shoe dealt it's the rhythm of presentation of such 8 possibilities that counts, especially by knowing that after having "concentrated" the various patterns distribution in this way, the short sub succession won't be much longer than three (in our example), four or five steps.
More later
as.
C= clustered (AA.. or BB..)
I= isolated (AB or BA)
Thus and by now the clusters lenght won't be taken into account here.
So AAAA or AA or BBBBB or BB will be ALL clustered apparition.
Say we want to classify three C or I patterns in a row, of course we'll have 8 possible patterns:
1) CCC
2) CCI
3) CIC
4) CII
5) III
6) IIC
7) ICI
8.) ICC
In essence per each shoe dealt it's the rhythm of presentation of such 8 possibilities that counts, especially by knowing that after having "concentrated" the various patterns distribution in this way, the short sub succession won't be much longer than three (in our example), four or five steps.
More later
as.