John Legend i understand you and i agree with you.
Cheers
Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Bally6354 on September 21, 2017, 04:20:47 PM
Nobody should ever really expect to read about a sure-fire winning method on a forum....just isn't happening, period! My conclusion is that you slowly learn what doesn't / can't work despite all the hype and even good intentions from the author. I must have given loads of bad advice down the years. It wasn't intentional, it was based on my thoughts / experiences at that particular moment in time. So the reality for any reader is that forums are a minefield if you aren't personally prepared to do a lot of hard work and think for yourself with a critical mind.
Quote from: Kimo Li on September 05, 2017, 01:35:43 PM
I am surprise to see that someone is interested in the Corner Matrix. In answer to your question, if the middle number of quad comes in, 5, 14, 23, or 32, then anywhere these numbers are on the matrix is considered a hit and can be 'crossed out'.
Investigate the Corner Matrix and you will find treasures, like the vertical numbers in the matrix belong to 4 layout quads and double streets. The horizontal numbers are column (row) numbers.
Essentially you can track 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 16, 18 and more numbers with the Corner Matrix. It is considered the Swiss knife of all the matrices. To learn more, just open your eyes and mind.
Quote from: AsymBacGuy on July 29, 2017, 01:02:15 AM
Yeah. This is one of the simplest way to play dozens.
We target the last two different dozens appeared then bet them hoping that the third will be silent as long as possible.
Of course it's like choosing to bet randomly two dozens out of three without assessing the silent one.
But acting in this way we have a general picture of what it's going to happen and by a decent bet selection and by a careful money management we might get good short-intermediate term results.
Say we put in our chart a minus sign (-) after a loss and a plus sign (+) after a win (zero/zeroes not included)
Most likely we'll get sequences as ++-+-++--+-+++++---++-++++-++++--+....
We can be sure as hell that itlr consecutive + will be double placed than single + and the same is true about - signs, this time by an opposite fashion. same about ++ vs longer ++ sequences and so on.
If we pnly bet one time whenever any single + (preceded by one or more minus sign registered) or whenever a single - (preceded by one or more + sign registered) had come out we are going to reduce variance.
We are not altering the W/L percentages, but we'll have the same results than wagering every hand (yet paying a minor vig).
Easy to notice that sequences as -+- or +-- will be losers and -++ or +-+ will be winners.
Of course itlr the winners will be double placed than losers.
If we choose to simultenously wager those two features by a 1-3 progression (1-1 and 3-3 bets) we know we'll lose whenever every -+-- sequence will come out. Every other situation will be a winning one.
Notice that sequences as ++------ or +-+----------- (terrible ones for a continuos play) are winning ones. Because we are respectively get our win on the first spot in the first sequence and on the second one on the second sequence.
Again the only losing sequences by adopting the 1-3 progression are -+--
After having tested many many real spins I can assure you that the probability to get consecutive patterns not winning just one spot is very low.
I mean that -+-- consecutive patterns don't come out quite often. More realistically I'd say you need a lot of spins to encounter a situation where you'll find two consecutive losing patterns.
For that matter looking at three consecutive losing patterns in a row is a sort of a "lottery" finding.
Actually the theorical probability odds to get three losses in a row are 1:729 (zero discounted) but in the real world the overall losing probability is well lower as an homogeneous world is just an utopia.
Wonder if we choose to wait and wait and wait the appearance of one or better two such fictional situations. We can only raise our probability of success.
Or trying to take advantage of many other possible profitable situations we should assess before betting.
Definetely the game is EV-, but only whether we consider any outcome equally probable anytime, everywhere and anyhow.
That's nonsense.
as.